Prof. Dr. Daniel Thym, LL.M. (London). Lehrstuhlinhaber. Lebenslauf. Jahrgang ; Schulzeit in Bonn. Daniel Thym, LL.M. Stellenausschreibungen. Kontakt. Alle Kontaktinformationen. Lehre. Alle Lehrveranstaltungen. FZAA. Daniel Thym, LL.M. (London), geboren , studierte in Regensburg, Paris, Berlin und London und war Mitarbeiter des Walter-Hallstein-Instituts für Europäisches.
Der SachverständigenratDaniel Thym (* in Tübingen) ist ein deutscher Jurist und Hochschullehrer an der Universität Konstanz. Inhaltsverzeichnis. 1 Leben; 2 Veröffentlichungen. Prof. Dr. Daniel Thym, LL.M. Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Öffentliches Recht mit Europa- und Völkerrecht an der Universität Konstanz und Kodirektor des dortigen. ABOUT THE AUTHOR. Daniel Thym. Daniel Thym is a Professor for Public, European and International Law at the University of Konstanz. POSTS BY Daniel.
Daniel Thym Lehrstuhlinhaber VideoGrenzgänger Wissenschaft - Wie kann Wissenschaft Integration unterstützen?
Durch seine Lockerheit und Einfhlsamkeit kann Katrin langsam Daniel Thym Tin Cup. - Daniel ThymFür ein Visum müssen ausländische Ehepartner in vielen Fällen "einfache deutsche Sprachkenntnisse" nachweisen. The contribution also introduces readers to overarching principles regarding mixed flows and the prescription of inter-state solidarity in Article 80 TFEU. Revisiting the classic dispute about social benefits demonstrates structural impediments of the judicial construction. Towards International Migration Musik Stranger Things In the supranational arena the parallelism between the constitutional foundations of internal and external action is most tangible — even if the decision-making procedure and the substantive constraints exemplify a variation on the supranational model. Its constitutional identity benchmark established national sovereignty as the last line of defence. The Elusive Limits of Solidarity. Notwithstanding the originality and relevance of the judicial Daniel Thym, this chapter supports a differentiated evaluation. Yet, Assassins Creed Origins Sonnenuhr official enthusiasm should be tempered. In view of the constant expansion of European foreign affairs their analysis however requires a partial detachment Johanniter Ritter the internal perspective by taking on board the particularities of international relations. Daniel Thym erklärt in einer schriftli In doing so, this chapter embeds the case law into a wider analytical framework, thereby illuminating the legal and constitutional infrastructure, which guides and explains individual judgments and which marks aspects for critical reflection.
Die Territorialstaaten europäischer Prägung sind im Ausgangspunkt immobil und das öffentliche Recht bildet dies ab. Ich wer-de daher übergreifende Aspekte des Migrationsfolgenrechts auf sedentäre Vorannahmen überprüfen und eine Rekonstruktion vorschlagen, die die Perspektive des Grenzübertritts reflektiert.
Dies lässt die sozialstaatliche Ungleichheitsschwelle nicht verschwinden, verlagert diese jedoch auf das Migrationsrecht, das als Vorposten über den Gebietsverbleib entscheidet, während das Sozialrecht den faktischen Inlandsaufenthalt gleichstellt.
Zwingend ist dies nicht. Man kann Territorialität und Sozialrecht auch anders zuordnen. Rechtliche, politische und kulturelle Zugehörigkeit: In den er-Jahren entwickelte sich in Wissenschaft und Praxis ein Konsens, dass eine Gebietszulassung schrittweise zu Aufenthaltssicherheit und soziökonomischer Gleichstellung führen soll.
In der Gegenwart sind wir weiter. Mit der Staatsangehörigkeitsrechtsreform und dem Zuwanderungsgesetz verabschiedete sich der deutsche Gesetzgeber von der Denizenship.
Ausländer sollen vollwertige Bürger werden können. Heute ist das Hauptproblem nicht länger die fehlende Teilhabeoption in Form des Wahlrechts und sonstiger Partizipationsrechte, sondern der begrenzte Teilnahmewunsch.
Gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhalt: Integration betrifft neben der strukturellen Einbindung in gesellschaftliche Teilbereiche auch die Tiefenschicht des gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalts, die wir im Sinn eines sedentären Bias bisweilen als selbstverständlich voraussetzen.
Aus der historischen Kontingenz kollektiver Identitätskonstruktionen folgt nicht, dass der Staat als Ordnungsprinzip sowie ein hierauf bezogener sozialer Zusammenhalt irrelevant wären.
Dem Grundgesetz ist ein Verfassungsziel der gesellschaftlichen Integration zu entnehmen, das inhaltlich auf Verständigung zielt, ohne eine Gestaltform vorzugeben.
In öffentlichen Debatten wird das Grundgesetz häufig als Grundlage des gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalts beschworen, ganz im Sinn eines Verfassungspatriotismus.
Es wäre jedoch ein Fehler, den Verfassungsbezug statisch zu deuten. Es wird näher ausgeführt, wie der Zusammenhalt im Zeichen von Migration erneuert werden kann.
Migrationssteuerung und Integrationsförderung widersprechen sich nicht. German History , Migration Law , Comparative Constitutional Law , Immigration And Integration In Europe , and Citizenship.
The free movement of persons is central to the legal and political identity of the European project; it is the most important right attached to Union citizenship and defines the self-perception of those holding the status.
Nevertheless, the precise legal standards for the delimitation of residence and equal treatment rights often remained elusive, in particular with regard to citizens with scarce resources.
It will be demonstrated that Union law and corresponding Court judgments most recently Brey and Dano fluctuate between two visions of how to perceive EU citizenship and the limits of transnational solidarity: one conception based on territorial presence and another promoting social cohesion.
European Union Citizenship , European Immigration and Asylum Law , Citizenship , Social Security Benefits , Freedom of movement , and Brexit.
Integration policy instruments disclose how European societies define themselves in response to migration. Pre-departure civic integration tests are emblematic of a new focus on social cohesion and have been a bone of contention in Pre-departure civic integration tests are emblematic of a new focus on social cohesion and have been a bone of contention in political and academic circles.
That is why the ECJ's long-awaited verdicts on Dutch integration requirements for spouses and long-term residents are a milestone in the construction of an EU immigration policy.
On this basis, it relates the outcome of both cases to the broader constitutional context in terms of human rights, the doctrine of individual statutory rights and non-discrimination guarantees — together with a contextual outlook on factors influencing the reorientation of integration policies.
Legal Framework for Entry and Border Controls, published in: Kay Hailbronner and Daniel Thym eds. Commentary, 2nd edition C.
It continues, on this basis, with one of the most detailed and reliable analyses of the scope of Union competences under Article 77 TFEU, whose provisions serve as the legal bases for supranational legislation on visas and border controls, including the move towards an integration management system.
The contribution also introduces readers to overarching principles on cooperation with third countries and the maintenance of law and order under Article 72 TFEU.
It concludes with a description of the international legal framework by focusing on whether there is a right to enter EU territory and discussing the extra- territorial scope of human rights guarantees.
European Law , Border Studies , Immigration And Integration In Europe , European Immigration and Asylum Law , and Schengen Visa policy. Legal Framework for EU Immigration Policy, published in: Kay Hailbronner and Daniel Thym eds.
It continues with one of the most detailed and reliable analyses of the scope of Union competences under Article 79 TFEU, whose provisions serve as the legal bases for supranational legislation on immigration.
On this basis, readers are introduced with overarching principles and objectives for lawmaking, including non-discrimination guarantees, abuse, the concept of migrant integration and the constitutional distinction between the free movement rights of Union citizens and the distinct guarantees for third-country nationals.
The contribution concludes with a description of the international legal framework with an emphasis on the protection of private and family life under Article 8 ECHR and the significance of bi- and multilateral agreements for EU immigration policy.
Legal Framework for EU Asylum Policy, published in: Kay Hailbronner and Daniel Thym eds. It continues, on this basis, with one of the most detailed and reliable analyses of the scope of Union competences under Article 78 TFEU, whose provisions serve as the legal bases for supranational legislation on asylum.
The contribution also introduces readers to overarching principles regarding mixed flows and the prescription of inter-state solidarity in Article 80 TFEU.
It concludes with a description of the international legal framework with an emphasis on the Geneva Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights for asylum policy.
In doing so, it discusses, for instance, the status and interpretation of the Geneva Convention within the EU legal order and the pertinence of the human rights enshrined in the ECHR for status determination, reception conditions and asylum procedure.
Asylum Law , Immigration And Integration In Europe , European Union , and European Immigration and Asylum Law. Introduction: EU Immigration and Asylum Law: Constitutional Framework and Principles for Interpretation, in: Kay Hailbronner and Daniel Thym eds.
The general introduction starts with general remarks on the evolution of the Treaty regime and objectives for lawmaking before analysing, in greater death, the principles for the interpretation of EU legislation on immigra-tion and asylum.
In doing so, it covers general principles, such as proportionality or the role of individual rights, as well as the significance of provisions on more favourable national measures on the basis of academic contributions and pertinent Court judgments on immigra-tion and asylum.
It proceeds with a general introduction into the Treaty rules governing the respective opt outs for Denmark, the United Kingdom and Ireland.
It concludes with an over-view of the requirements of human rights and public international law under the EU Charter, the European Convention, the Refugee Convention and other international agreements.
The general introduction is complemented by chapters with more detailed information on the legal framework for border control and entry policies, immigration and asylum.
Immigration And Integration In Europe , European Constitutional Law , International Migration , and European Immigration and Asylum Law.
Family as Link. Explaining the Judicial Change of Direction on Residence Rights of Family Members from Third States, in: Herwig Verschueren ed , Residence, Employment and Social Rights of Mobile Persons.
On How EU Law Defines Where They Belong Intersentia, , pp. Rules on family reunion are a complex and controversial area of law whose rationalisation is complicated by the overlap of distinct legal regimes for Union citizens and third-country nationals.
This contribution sets out to reconstruct This contribution sets out to reconstruct the evolution and rationale of the rules in question, including the change of direction on family reunion in the context of free movement in more recent ECJ case law.
It explains the judicial reorientation on the basis of doctrinal considerations, the constitutional setting and the broader socio-economic context.
While the generous family reunion regime for Union citizens followed the equality-based logic of economic and social policy objectives at the time, the change of direction can be attributed to the emergence of migration law as a distinct policy field within the area of freedom, security and justice.
Human rights complement Union citizenship as an alternative frame of reference for deciding individual cases. This contribution cannot unmake the continued overlap of both sets of rules and the uncertainties this entails, but it can support its reconstruction by deciphering the underlying reasons for the instability of the case law.
European Union Citizenship , European Immigration and Asylum Law , and European Human Rights Law With Special Attention to ECHR.
The Limits of Transnational Scholarship on EU Law. Scholarship on EU law is well established but arguably lacks sensitivity to the methodological characteristics of transnational discourse.
The defining features of the supranational legal order are more fluid than those of domestic legal The defining features of the supranational legal order are more fluid than those of domestic legal systems and, moreover, academic debates occur in different languages.
This contribution highlights the limits of transnational debates about EU law through a quantitative assessment of both citation practices and the geographical spread of authorship in specialised law journals.
Against that background, it uses the example of Germany to designate areas defining national specificities in the methodological approach towards EU law.
In doing so, this contribution considers language regimes, publication formats, the role of legal education and practice, the relative weight of theoretical and doctrinal approaches, as well as interaction with international and constitutional law.
European Studies , Constitutional Law , and European Law. Frontiers of EU Citizenship. Three Trajectories and their Methodological Foundations, forthcoming in: Dimitry Kochenov ed.
The Role of Rights CUP, As a supranational polity, the European Union depends — much more than a nation-state — upon the law and judges to preserve its viability and to develop its constitutional infrastructure.
It therefore did not come as a great surprise when It therefore did not come as a great surprise when the ECJ started exploring the potential of the Treaty rules on Union citizenship.
However, the outcome of individual cases and the overall orientation of the case law have remained controversial.
There was and remains nothing inevitable in the evolution of Union citizenship, since there are different visions of how to conceptualise the legal rules which direct judicial decisions and underlie academic interventions on the topic below II.
To highlight these divergent trajectories supports an enhanced methodological sensitivity on the part of academics, who often argue for particular outcomes without explicitly explaining their underlying decisions and the alternatives they rejected III.
Against this background, this contribution will extrapolate three trajectories which define the academic debate on the judicial evolution of Union citizenship.
Throughout this chapter, I will use selected examples to explain the relevance of these routes in the resolution of individual cases disclosing the status of Union citizenship.
Comparative Constitutional Law , European Union Citizenship , European Immigration and Asylum Law , and Citizenship. Attack or Retreat?
Evolving Themes and Strategies of the Judicial Dialogue between the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice, published in: Catherine van de Heyning and Maartje de Visser eds.
For decades, the relationship between the German Bundesverfassungsgericht and the European Court of Justice has captured the imagination of European lawyers.
Many European lawyers are fascinated by a potential clash between Karlsruhe and Many European lawyers are fascinated by a potential clash between Karlsruhe and Luxembourg, and have spent hours reflecting on a conflict, which has so far been limited to shadow boxing.
The underlying reason for the absence of open conflict may be the practice of indirect judicial dialogue, with both courts cautiously observing each other and their respective case law.
Arguably, the very idea of constitutional dialogue entered the European debate when the German constitutional court rejected the unconditional supremacy of EU law in the Solange cases.
Like a good football match, interaction between the German and the European court has gone through different phases. In the early minutes of the game, the German court was on the attack.
Its Solange cases effectively forced the ECJ to develop unwritten human rights standards at the European level. At the time, most observers agreed that the German court was the dominant player Section II.
The success of this undertaking motivated Karlsruhe to repeat its strategy. In its Maastricht judgment the German court put pressure on Luxembourg to take the delimitation of competences seriously.
Again, it wanted to force its vision of European constitutionalism upon the ECJ. This time, however, it had a limited impact only. The last 15 years have been like the middle-phase of a football match: the two courts have cautiously observed each other in midfield Section III.
In its Lisbon judgment Karlsruhe changed its tactics. Instead of projecting the German understanding of human rights or competences upon the ECJ, the Bundesverfassungsgericht adopted a defensive strategy.
It accepted the interpretative autonomy of Union law and retreated to the domestic arena the penalty box in our football metaphor. Its constitutional identity benchmark established national sovereignty as the last line of defence.
Behind that line the ultimate trophy of European federal statehood waited to be conquered. The game would be over; the German court would abandon its claim of ultimate authority Section IV.
But this may not happen in our lifetime. As you know, the Germans are, at least in football, have a good defence. Arguably, the constitutional identity standard may contribute to a new constitutional balance between national and European legal orders Section V.
Comparative Constitutional Law and European Constitutional Law. Debates about differentiated integration are among the rituals of European integration.
More recent arguments about differentiated integration replicate earlier debates and yet, there is something novel about them. It is true that the experience with various forms of differentiated integration over the past two decades has been fairly positive: defence policy, justice and home affairs and the generic mechanism for enhanced cooperation demonstrate that differentiated integration within the EU framework may proceed rather smoothly in practice.
Also, the crisis of monetary union does not originate primarily in the asymmetric non-participation of some Member States, but in the structural deficits of both the Treaty design and its implementation.
This shows that differentiated integration can support the integration process. What is new about recent developments, however, is the pertinence and visibility of differentiated integration as a result of the euro crisis.
It is no longer a peripheral occurrence, but takes centre stage in legal and political debates. The assessment of the constitutional implications of differentiated integration has become a vital question for the future of Europe: Does it undermine the supranational rule of law?
What are the consequences for the institutional balance and the role of Member States? In addressing these questions, this contribution will defend the proposition that legal difficulties can be contained — both in the case of intra-EU differentiation and satellite treaties under public international law III.
Differentiated integration may stabilise the rule of law by accommodating internal tensions and heterogeneities, while it may, at the same time, undermine the legitimatory infrastructure of the European project IV.
European integration , European Law , European Constitutional Law , and Schengen. Parliamentary Involvement in European International Relations, published in: Marise Cremona and Bruno de Witte eds.
From a historic perspective, the argument about parliamentary involvement in foreign affairs continues the struggle between the ancient prerogatives of the monarch and the novel claims for democratic self-governance.
Foreign policy was Parliamentary oversight of foreign affairs continues to trail behind the role of parliaments in domestic policies.
Within the European Union, this relates not only to the Common Foreign and Security Policy with its largely intergovernmental design, but similarly extends to various aspects of external EC policies which in many cases retain limited parliamentary involvement.
Or does the analysis of parliamentary accountability of European foreign affairs rather point at an underlying conceptual specificity of external relations which justifies and guides the special constitutional treatment of EU international relations?
Any legal analysis of parliamentary powers in foreign affairs must assign the leading part to the parliamentary control of international treaties as the international equivalent of domestic laws.
There are however important differences between the rigidity of domestic legal rules, whose adoption, interpretation and change follows much stricter procedural patterns than the often dynamic, evolutionary and practice-dominated international legal regimes, which the scrutiny of parliamentary control of international treaties must take into account section II.
The entry into force of the Constitutional Treaty would not fundamentally reverse the picture of parliamentary involvement in international treaty-making at the European and national level — despite some important new rights for the European Parliament.
International relations are much less than domestic politics dominated by rule-making. The main regulatory instrument of the Community method are legal rules adopted by the European institutions, published in the Official Journal, transposed and implemented by national legislators and administrations and interpreted uniformly by the European court system.
International relations however are primarily about the political positioning in favour or against something: North Korea will not give up its nuclear weapons, only because the European Union says so in its Official Journal.
Instead, foreign policy requires the identification of strategic goals, the development and constant adaptation of methods of their realisation and implementation.
You may call it diplomacy, but in any case it differs substantially from domestic politics. The persistence of the special treatment of the European Parliament in foreign affairs and the identification of substantive differences between domestic policies and international relations leads us to more general considerations on the underlying conceptual specificity of the European foreign affairs constitution for which the specific role of the European Parliament is an important indicator section V.
The Role of the European Parliament in the CFSP, published in: European Foreign Affairs Review 11 , — more. The European Parliament is confident of its democratic credentials.
The constitutional status quo of the Treaty of Nice lays the starting-point for our survey, whose course not even the Constitutional Treaty would have altered substantially section I.
The continued involvement of national parliaments in CFSP does not substantially alter the situation section IV. The Elusive Limits of Solidarity.
Residence Rights of and Social Benefits for Economically In-active Union Citizens, Common Market Law Review 52 , more.
Nevertheless, the precise legal standards for the delimitation of transnational residence and equal treatment rights often remained elusive, in particular with regard to citizens with scarce ressources.
It will be demonstrated that Union law and corresponding Court judgments fluctuate between two visions of how to perceive EU citizenship and the limits of transnational solidarity in free movement cases: one conception based on territorial presence and another promoting social cohesion.
European Union Citizenship , European Constitutional Law , and European Immigration and Asylum Law. Residence as De Facto Citizenship?
Protection of Long-Term Residence under Article 8 ECHR, published in: Ruth Rubio-Marin ed. When it comes to the protection of human rights of foreigners, the European Court of Human Rights ECtHR in Strasbourg has long assumed a pioneering role.
It was the first international court to extend the human rights of foreigners It was the first international court to extend the human rights of foreigners beyond the sphere of refugee protection in cases of forced migration, which have been subject to international law guarantees since the s, to voluntary migration on the basis of Article 8 ECHR.
In , the Court first qualified the deportation of a foreigner as a violation of his right to family life; ten years later, the judges in Strasbourg obliged a Contracting State to grant cross-border family reunion in its territory with family members living abroad; in recent years, the Grand Chamber has further extended the protective reach of Article 8 ECHR to cover long-term residence status, including a potential right to regularise illegal stay.
Is the traditional distinction between foreigners without residence security and national citizens obsolete? Despite its radical judgments, the Court has always been careful not to overstretch its case law by leaving some leeway to the Contracting Parties under the margin of appreciation doctrine, also when it comes to the protection of long-term residence status and the corresponding right to regularise illegal stay part 2.
Notwithstanding the originality and relevance of the judicial approach, this chapter supports a differentiated evaluation. This advance of human rights law into cross-border migration rejects the assertion of unfettered state control over the entry and stay of foreigners, but does not necessarily lead towards de facto citizenship.
Protecting the human rights of all non-citizens is in itself an important cosmopolitan achievement part 3. Irregular Migration , European Immigration and Asylum Law , and European Human Rights Law With Special Attention to ECHR.
Constitutional Foundations of the Judgments on the EEC-Turkey Association Agreement, published in: Daniel Thym and Margarite Zoeteweij-Turhan eds.
Degrees of Free Movement and Citizenship Brill Nijhoff, , pp. It is widely accepted that the ECJ judgments on the Ankara Agreement, the Additional Protocol and the Decisions of the Association Council hereinafter: EU-Turkey association acquis are crucial points of reference for migration law and It is widely accepted that the ECJ judgments on the Ankara Agreement, the Additional Protocol and the Decisions of the Association Council hereinafter: EU-Turkey association acquis are crucial points of reference for migration law and wider bilateral relations.
While many contributions rightly focus on the formidable doctrinal questions, which individual judgments or lines of cases bring out, this chapter sets off to scrutinise the role of the Court of Justice ECJ from a broader perspective.
In doing so, this chapter embeds the case law into a wider analytical framework, thereby illuminating the legal and constitutional infrastructure, which guides and explains individual judgments and which marks aspects for critical reflection.
EU External Relations Law , European Immigration and Asylum Law , and Turkey And Europe. EU Migration Policy and its Constitutional Rationale: A Cosmopolitan Outlook, Common Market Law Review Vol.
There is much confusion among EU experts about the legal status of third-country nationals. This is hardly surprising, since this uncertainty reflects conceptual tensions at the heart of the European project.
Klausur sind in Ilias eingestellt und werden alsbald freigeschaltet. Sie werden mit einer E-mail über die Verfügbarkeit der Korrekturen benachrichtigt.
Eine schriftliche Remonstration ist innerhalb von zwei Wochen ab dem Zeitpunkt der Verfügbarkeit per e-mail möglich unter office.
Bitte begründen Sie in Ihrer Remonstration ausführlich, warum und mit welcher Begründung Sie mit der Bewertung nicht einverstanden sind.
Mit über Seiten ist das Handels- und Kooperationsabkommens mit dem Vereinigten Königreich lang und noch dazu kompliziert.
Dies erschwert den Parlamenten die Kontrolle des Vertragsinhalts. Daniel Thym erklärt in einer schriftli Nach zwei Jahren intensiven Beratungen stellt die Fachkommission ihren Abschlussbericht vor , den die aktuelle Bundesregierung im Koalitionsvertrag verabredet hatte.